| Dawn today |
Closing the back cover of wonderful books opens a delicious sigh: what next… Mark Taylor’s Picture in Question (see previous blog) gives a clue near his conclusion:
“Tansey finds in complexity theory a way to understand the intricate diversity of the networks within which we are forever caught. Different systems structured in different ways act and interact differently to produce the inescapable timely rhythms of life. The sites of these interactions are something like interfaces, which mark transitions between different phases of life. Life is neither totally ordered nor completely chaotic but is always lived at the edge of chaos. In figuring complexity, Tansey figures what can never be completely figured and thus must forever be refigured.” p. 127, Mark C. Taylor, The Picture in Question: Mark Tansey and the Ends of Representation.
Hmmm…consider chaos/complexity theory. A second book I’d been reading alongside Picture in Question which I also just completed (as if a good read is ever done with) is Julian Hartt’s Theological Method and Imagination. His final chapter, “Story as the Art of Historical Truth,” also suggest direction:
“This does not mean that everything believed—and hated/cherished—to have happened actually happened. Indeed we learn over and over again how memory and story have warped the facts. But the corrections which matter most, in respect to history, are not corrections in fact-determinations. Leave those to the mole historians. In respect to historicality the decisive corrections are all personal, perceptual, dispositional. Can one come to accept the story? Can one come to see that it is one’s own story, that one’s own reality is contained in it? Can one come to see that one’s reality is not a product, a mechanical toss-off, of the past? Can one come to see that one is an actor in the story? For rightly to tell it is to reenact it passionally.” p 245, Theological Method and Imagination, Julian N. Hartt
Dawn today 2
With such guidance in mind and after considering the array of volumes around my desks, the winner is: Frank Wilczek, A Beautiful Question: Finding Nature’s Deep Design. Wilczek won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2004 and has an earlier book Longing for the Harmonies. Opening pages are very promising:
“The new concept of reality…is that the primary ingredients of physical reality are not point-like particles, but rather space-filling fields. The new method is inspired guesswork. [emphasis in original]…
But what is the physicist’s ‘inspired guesswork’ inspired? Logical consistency is necessary, but hardly sufficient. Rather it was beauty and symmetry that guided Maxwell and his followers—that is, all modern physicists—closer to truth… [Maxwell’s] work, by clarifying the limits of perception, allows us to transcend those limits [of sensory experience]. For the ultimate sense-enhancing device is a searching mind.” p. 7, Frank Wilczek, A Beautiful Question: Finding Nature’s Deep Design
| Dawn today... |



